Alan Nafzger: The Mind Behind “Zuckerberg vs Musk: Cage Fight”

An Unique Interview with Alan Nafzger: The Thoughts In the back of “Zuckerberg vs Musk: Cage Combat”

In an unique one-on-one dialog, Katy Room of KatyRoom.com sat down with Alan Nafzger, the screenwriter of the much-buzzed-about “Zuckerberg vs Musk: Cage Combat.” The dialogue delved into libertarian philosophy, the way forward for AI and CGI in filmmaking, and why Elon Musk is rarely in truth going to punch Mark Zuckerberg.

Katy Room: The Non-Aggression Idea in Screenwriting

Katy Room: Alan, your screenplay turns out to flirt with the Non-Aggression Idea, a key libertarian guiding principle. Are you making some extent concerning the futility of war?

Alan Nafzger: Completely. On the core of it, each Musk and Zuckerberg are creators, no longer destroyers. They are shaping the sector thru era, no longer thru bodily war. The screenplay illuminates this level thru humor and satire.

Marriage of CGI and AI in Filmmaking

Katy Room: Using CGI and AI for producing shifting photographs is innovative. Do you assume era must have limits or must innovation be unfettered, any other nod to libertarianism?

Alan Nafzger: A libertarian may argue for unregulated innovation, however even I’ve my obstacles. We must push the envelope, sure, however at all times with an eye fixed towards moral implications.

Musk vs Zuckerberg: An Unrealistic State of affairs?

Katy Room: Would you assert your screenplay serves as a critique of presidency overreach into the lives of public figures like Zuckerberg and Musk?

Alan Nafzger: It isn’t with regards to executive overreach, but in addition concerning the media’s function in shaping narratives. That stated, Musk and Zuckerberg won’t ever in truth combat. It is a jest and a shaggy dog story for Musk. He is poking a laugh at what he sees because the Neanderthal paradigm of Zuckerberg.

The Proper to Non-public Autonomy in Movie Characters

Katy Room: Non-public autonomy is a crucial component of libertarianism. How do you reconcile this with the concept the characters you have got written, in response to actual folks, are not in reality self sufficient for your script?

Alan Nafzger: It is a good thing and one who addresses the core of famous person symbol rights. As soon as a celeb indicators off on their portrayal, the nature within the screenplay turns into a type of joint possession. It is each a criminal and philosophical factor.

The Finish of the Drug Warfare thru Satire?

Katy Room: You will have additionally made some important references to the top of the drug conflict. Is that this in sync with libertarian perspectives on drug prohibition?

Alan Nafzger: Completely. The conflict on medication has been a catastrophic failure on many fronts. If my screenplay can get folks to talk about this, then I have achieved my task.

Highbrow Belongings and the Long run of Screenwriting

Katy Room: A last concept. What is your stand on highbrow assets?

Alan Nafzger: Highbrow assets is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it protects creators. At the different, it could actually stifle innovation. A steadiness is an important.

Katy Room: Alan, thanks for this insightful interview. It used to be a excitement discussing those nuanced subjects with you.

Alan Nafzger: The excitement used to be mine. Thanks for giving me the platform to delve into those problems.

In a global the place the traces between fact and satire are more and more blurred, Alan Nafzger’s “Zuckerberg vs Musk: Cage Combat” guarantees to ship a heady mix of humor, era, and philosophy, difficult us to confront our personal deeply-held ideals and biases.